It was an invitation, and you answered it with the org chart. Senior Manager. Product Lead. VP of Something. A title tells people where you sit. It tells them nothing about why you're worth betting on, which is the thing they were actually asking.
About 40 to 60 minutes. You leave with a four-part positioning statement, a version to say out loud, a version to write down, and a message asking one person you name whether it sounds like you.
You're skilled, credible, and you deliver. Somewhere between doing the work and talking about it, the signal gets cut. You explain your role well. You don't explain your value at all.
Meanwhile people who do less but position better are getting the introductions and the air time. It's tempting to file that under politics. Mostly they just have an answer to "why you?" and you have a job title.
If you've ever called someone "good at positioning" and meant it as an insult, that's worth sitting with. You're treating a skill as a character flaw, and it's standing between you and work you've already earned.
Asked what you do, you list activities. Projects, responsibilities, remit. What you don't mention is the problem you solve that nobody else quite solves, or what you see that others miss. Accurate, and interchangeable with forty other people.
They have a story and a phrase and a reputation that arrives in the room ahead of them. You have a track record that stays behind you. The gap in skill is small. The gap in positioning is not.
You think you need to feel more sure before you speak up. What you need is a sentence about yourself that's specific enough to be useful and true enough to say without wincing. Clarity comes first, and confidence tends to follow it.
A positioning brief built from the assets that held up under questioning. It gives you a sentence to say when someone asks what you do, a paragraph for LinkedIn, an internal bio or a promotion case, a message to test it on one person, and a plan for the next two weeks.
What do you bring that the next person at your level doesn't? The session goes looking for it, and it isn't your title.
Every asset gets tested against real evidence, and the stakeholder map shows who is currently holding which version of you.
A four-part statement, a version to say out loud and a version to write down. Then a message asking one named person whether it sounds like you.
Included in every pilot seat
This is session 2 of Be seen. A pilot is one programme for up to 20 people: three sessions each, and a check-in sixty days after they start. You get a report on the whole group. Each person’s document stays private unless they choose to share it with you.
See how the pilot works →Here for yourself rather than a team? Take the diagnostic on your own.
For years I assumed positioning was what people did instead of real work.
I was the analyst who stayed late and built the best models and assumed the work would talk. It didn't. People with half my technical ability got the opportunities, because they had a sentence about themselves and I had a spreadsheet.
It changed at a skip-level. A director I'd never met asked what I did, and I described my role. He nodded, politely, and moved on. A colleague described his value instead, and the director remembered his name. Same meeting, same level, two completely different outcomes, and it took me an embarrassingly long time to work out why.
This session is what I spent years fumbling toward. Not branding. An honest, specific answer to "why you?", built from evidence and tested by something sceptical before you take it into a room.
20 seats, one quarter, nothing to pay. It ends by itself when the quarter does. No auto-renewal, nothing to cancel.
After the pilot: £119 per person, per programme, check-in included. How pricing works
20 seats · one quarter · ends on its own